2002 Seat Toledo vs. 1963 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2002 Seat Toledo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Seat Toledo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Seat Toledo (104 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1963 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Seat Toledo should accelerate faster than 1963 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Seat Toledo weights approximately 260 kg more than 1963 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Seat Toledo (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2002 Seat Toledo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Seat Toledo | 1963 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Seat | Wartburg |
Model | Toledo | 312 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 6.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 43 L |