2002 Skoda Fabia vs. 1960 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2002 Skoda Fabia is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Skoda Fabia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Skoda Fabia (74 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1960 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Fabia should accelerate faster than 1960 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Skoda Fabia weights approximately 314 kg more than 1960 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Skoda Fabia (126 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2002 Skoda Fabia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Skoda Fabia | 1960 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Skoda | Triumph |
| Model | Fabia | Herald |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1074 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 29 L |
