2002 Skoda Octavia vs. 1941 Volvo PV
To start off, 2002 Skoda Octavia is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Volvo PV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Volvo PV would be higher. At 3,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1941 Volvo PV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Skoda Octavia (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1941 Volvo PV. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Octavia should accelerate faster than 1941 Volvo PV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Volvo PV weights approximately 105 kg more than 2002 Skoda Octavia.
Because 1941 Volvo PV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Volvo PV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Skoda Octavia | 1941 Volvo PV | |
| Make | Skoda | Volvo |
| Model | Octavia | PV |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1941 |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 3668 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1490 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2880 mm |
