2002 Skoda Octavia vs. 1951 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2002 Skoda Octavia is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Skoda Octavia (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1951 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Octavia should accelerate faster than 1951 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Talbot Baby weights approximately 265 kg more than 2002 Skoda Octavia.
Because 1951 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Skoda Octavia | 1951 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Skoda | Talbot |
Model | Octavia | Baby |
Year Released | 2002 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3130 mm |