2002 Skoda Octavia vs. 2011 Ford F-250
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Skoda Octavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Skoda Octavia would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 296 more horse power than 2002 Skoda Octavia. (89 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2002 Skoda Octavia.
Because 2011 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Skoda Octavia. (211 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Skoda Octavia.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Skoda Octavia | 2011 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Skoda | Ford |
Model | Octavia | F-250 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 211 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 132 L |