2002 Skoda Superb vs. 2010 Hummer H3
To start off, 2010 Hummer H3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Skoda Superb. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Skoda Superb would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Hummer H3 (363 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 2002 Skoda Superb. (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Skoda Superb.
Because 2010 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Skoda Superb. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Skoda Superb | 2010 Hummer H3 | |
| Make | Skoda | Hummer |
| Model | Superb | H3 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 363 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 19.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2000 mm |
