2002 Skoda Superb vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Skoda Superb. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Skoda Superb would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 11 kg more than 2002 Skoda Superb.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Skoda Superb. (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Skoda Superb.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Skoda Superb | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Skoda | Volvo |
Model | Superb | C30 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |