2002 Smart ForTwo vs. 1979 TVR 3000
To start off, 2002 Smart ForTwo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 TVR 3000 weights approximately 205 kg more than 2002 Smart ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Smart ForTwo | 1979 TVR 3000 | |
| Make | Smart | TVR |
| Model | ForTwo | 3000 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 799 cc | 2994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 58 L |
