2002 Spyker C8 vs. 2010 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2010 Renault Scenic is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Spyker C8 weights approximately 3 kg more than 2010 Renault Scenic.
Because 2002 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Spyker C8 | 2010 Renault Scenic | |
| Make | Spyker | Renault |
| Model | C8 | Scenic |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4172 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 133 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1218 kg | 1215 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 60 L |
