2002 Spyker C8 vs. 2010 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2010 Smart ForTwo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 3,998 cc, 2002 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Spyker C8 weights approximately 530 kg more than 2010 Smart ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Spyker C8 | 2010 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Spyker | Smart |
| Model | C8 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3998 cc | 1000 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 33 L |
