2002 SsangYong Korando vs. 1966 Volkswagen 1600
To start off, 2002 SsangYong Korando is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volkswagen 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volkswagen 1600 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 785 kg more than 1966 Volkswagen 1600.
Because 2002 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Volkswagen 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 SsangYong Korando | 1966 Volkswagen 1600 | |
Make | SsangYong | Volkswagen |
Model | Korando | 1600 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2480 mm |