2002 SsangYong Rexton vs. 1942 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 2002 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 SsangYong Rexton (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10.
Because 2002 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 SsangYong Rexton | 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
Make | SsangYong | Volvo |
Model | Rexton | PV 801-10 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1942 |
Engine Size | 2874 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3260 mm |