2002 SsangYong Rexton vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2002 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 SsangYong Rexton (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Because 2002 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 SsangYong Rexton (256 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 SsangYong Rexton | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | SsangYong | Volvo |
| Model | Rexton | 66 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2874 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 256 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.4 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 22.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
