2002 SsangYong Rexton vs. 1998 Volvo S80
To start off, 2002 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Volvo S80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Volvo S80 would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Volvo S80 (178 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2002 SsangYong Rexton. (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 2002 SsangYong Rexton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 267 kg more than 1998 Volvo S80.
Because 2002 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Volvo S80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 SsangYong Rexton (256 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Volvo S80. (240 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2002 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Volvo S80.
Compare all specifications:
2002 SsangYong Rexton | 1998 Volvo S80 | |
Make | SsangYong | Volvo |
Model | Rexton | S80 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2874 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 178 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 256 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.4 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 22.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 16.4 seconds | 9.1 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1851 kg | 1584 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 80 L |