2002 SsangYong Rexton vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 SsangYong Rexton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 SsangYong Rexton would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2002 SsangYong Rexton. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2002 SsangYong Rexton.
Because 2002 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 SsangYong Rexton (256 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2002 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 SsangYong Rexton | 2006 Holden Epica | |
| Make | SsangYong | Holden |
| Model | Rexton | Epica |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2874 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 256 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
