2002 SsangYong Rexton vs. 2010 Koenigsegg CCX
To start off, 2010 Koenigsegg CCX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 SsangYong Rexton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 SsangYong Rexton would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Koenigsegg CCX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Koenigsegg CCX (806 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 688 more horse power than 2002 SsangYong Rexton. (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Koenigsegg CCX should accelerate faster than 2002 SsangYong Rexton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 671 kg more than 2010 Koenigsegg CCX.
Because 2002 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Koenigsegg CCX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Koenigsegg CCX (919 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 663 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 SsangYong Rexton. (256 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Koenigsegg CCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 SsangYong Rexton.
Compare all specifications:
2002 SsangYong Rexton | 2010 Koenigsegg CCX | |
Make | SsangYong | Koenigsegg |
Model | Rexton | CCX |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2874 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 806 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 256 Nm | 919 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 22.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 16.4 seconds | 3.2 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1851 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 18 L/100km |