2002 Subaru Outback vs. 1951 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2002 Subaru Outback is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Subaru Outback (154 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Renown. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Subaru Outback weights approximately 206 kg more than 1951 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Subaru Outback (224 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Subaru Outback | 1951 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Subaru | Triumph |
| Model | Outback | Renown |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2457 cc | 2088 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 99.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 92 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1284 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2750 mm |
