2002 Subaru Outback vs. 1963 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2002 Subaru Outback is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Subaru Outback (154 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Subaru Outback weights approximately 560 kg more than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Subaru Outback | 1963 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Subaru | Volkswagen |
Model | Outback | 1500 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2457 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 40 L |