2002 Subaru Outback vs. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2002 Subaru Outback is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2002 Subaru Outback. (154 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2002 Subaru Outback. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Subaru Outback weights approximately 350 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 2002 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Subaru Outback | 1964 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Subaru | Sunbeam |
Model | Outback | Tiger |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2457 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2190 mm |