2002 Subaru Outback vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Subaru Outback is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Subaru Outback (154 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Subaru Outback weights approximately 320 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Subaru Outback (224 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Subaru Outback | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Subaru | Triumph |
Model | Outback | 2000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2457 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.5 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 64 L |