2002 Subaru Outback vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 2002 Subaru Outback is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Subaru Outback (154 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 240.
Because 2002 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Subaru Outback (224 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 240. (127 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Subaru Outback | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Subaru | Volvo |
Model | Outback | 240 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2457 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2660 mm |