2002 Subaru Outback vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 2002 Subaru Outback is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (200 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2002 Subaru Outback. (154 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2002 Subaru Outback.
Because 2002 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Acura TL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Subaru Outback | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Subaru | Acura |
Model | Outback | TL |
Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2457 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2840 mm |