2002 Subaru Outback vs. 2009 Holden UTE

To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 203 more horse power than 2002 Subaru Outback. (154 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2002 Subaru Outback.

Because 2002 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Subaru Outback. (224 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Subaru Outback. 2002 Subaru Outback has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2009 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Subaru Outback will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Subaru Outback 2009 Holden UTE
Make Subaru Holden
Model Outback UTE
Year Released 2002 2009
Body Type Station Wagon Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2457 cc 6000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type boxer V
Horse Power 154 HP 357 HP
Torque 224 Nm 530 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors