2002 Subaru Outback vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (290 HP) has 82 more horse power than 2002 Subaru Outback. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2002 Subaru Outback. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Subaru Outback weights approximately 35 kg more than 2010 Kia Cadenza.
Because 2002 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Kia Cadenza. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Subaru Outback | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
| Make | Subaru | Kia |
| Model | Outback | Cadenza |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 290 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4965 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2845 mm |
