2002 Suzuki Covie vs. 2001 Rover 75
To start off, 2002 Suzuki Covie is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Rover 75 (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Rover 75 weights approximately 775 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Rover 75 (240 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (111 Nm). This means 2001 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Covie.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Suzuki Covie | 2001 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Rover |
| Model | Covie | 75 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 111 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2950 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1530 mm | 2830 mm |
