2002 Suzuki Covie vs. 2004 Alfa Romeo 166
To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki Covie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki Covie would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 (217 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 800 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 (265 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (111 Nm). This means 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Covie.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Suzuki Covie | 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 | |
Make | Suzuki | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Covie | 166 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2959 cc |
Engine Type | electric | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 265 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2950 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1530 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 69 L |