2002 Suzuki Covie vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki Covie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki Covie would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 189 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Covie.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Rover 75 (245 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (111 Nm). This means 2006 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Covie.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Suzuki Covie | 2006 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Rover |
| Model | Covie | 75 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 256 HP |
| Torque | 111 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 2950 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1530 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 65 L |
