2002 Suzuki Covie vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki Covie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki Covie would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2002 Suzuki Covie is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 306 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Covie.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volkswagen Polo (127 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (111 Nm). This means 2008 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Covie. 2002 Suzuki Covie has automatic transmission and 2008 Volkswagen Polo has manual transmission. 2008 Volkswagen Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki Covie will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Suzuki Covie | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Suzuki | Volkswagen |
| Model | Covie | Polo |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1390 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 111 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1056 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2950 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1530 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 45 L |
