2002 Suzuki Covie vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki Covie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki Covie would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Covie.
Because 2009 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Covie, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (111 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Covie. 2002 Suzuki Covie has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden Colorado has manual transmission. 2009 Holden Colorado will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki Covie will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Suzuki Covie | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Suzuki | Holden |
Model | Covie | Colorado |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 111 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |