2002 Suzuki Covie vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki Covie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki Covie would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2002 Suzuki Covie is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cee'd (120 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 513 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Cee'd (154 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (111 Nm). This means 2010 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Covie.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Suzuki Covie | 2010 Kia Cee'd | |
| Make | Suzuki | Kia |
| Model | Covie | Cee'd |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1591 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 111 Nm | 154 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1263 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2950 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1530 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 53 L |
