2002 Suzuki Covie vs. 2010 Renault Duster

To start off, 2010 Renault Duster is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki Covie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki Covie would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2002 Suzuki Covie is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Duster (104 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Duster should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Duster weights approximately 450 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Renault Duster is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Suzuki Covie. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Duster will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Duster (148 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (111 Nm). This means 2010 Renault Duster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Covie. 2002 Suzuki Covie has automatic transmission and 2010 Renault Duster has manual transmission. 2010 Renault Duster will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki Covie will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: