2002 Suzuki Covie vs. 2013 Honda Accord
To start off, 2013 Honda Accord is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki Covie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki Covie would be higher. At 2,356 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Honda Accord is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda Accord (182 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda Accord weights approximately 781 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Honda Accord (245 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (111 Nm). This means 2013 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Covie.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Suzuki Covie | 2013 Honda Accord | |
Make | Suzuki | Honda |
Model | Covie | Accord |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2356 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 245 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1531 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2950 mm | 4862 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1465 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1530 mm | 2775 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 65 L |