2002 Suzuki F1 vs. 1973 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2002 Suzuki F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Suzuki F1 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1973 Triumph Spitfire. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki F1 should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 690 kg more than 1973 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Suzuki F1 (106 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph Spitfire. (93 Nm). This means 2002 Suzuki F1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Suzuki F1 | 1973 Triumph Spitfire | |
| Make | Suzuki | Triumph |
| Model | F1 | Spitfire |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1296 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 780 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2110 mm |
