2002 Suzuki F1 vs. 2001 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Smart ForFour. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Smart ForFour would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2002 Suzuki F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Smart ForFour (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 500 kg more than 2001 Smart ForFour.
Because 2002 Suzuki F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Suzuki F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Smart ForFour (125 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2001 Smart ForFour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Suzuki F1 | 2001 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Suzuki | Smart |
| Model | F1 | ForFour |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1332 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 970 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 47 L |
