2002 Suzuki F1 vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki F1 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL (311 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL (360 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Suzuki F1 | 2011 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
| Make | Suzuki | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | F1 | SL |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3498 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |
