2002 Suzuki F1 vs. 2013 BMW X1
To start off, 2013 BMW X1 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki F1 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 BMW X1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X1 (296 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X1 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X1 weights approximately 295 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 BMW X1 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Suzuki F1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 BMW X1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW X1 (407 Nm) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2013 BMW X1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Suzuki F1 | 2013 BMW X1 | |
Make | Suzuki | BMW |
Model | F1 | X1 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2979 cc |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1765 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 63 L |