2002 Suzuki Twin vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2002 Suzuki Twin is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Baby (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Twin. (42 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Twin. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 1050 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Twin. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Twin, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Suzuki Twin | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Suzuki | Talbot |
| Model | Twin | Baby |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 42 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2740 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 3130 mm |
