2002 Tata E vs. 2009 Ascari KZ1
To start off, 2009 Ascari KZ1 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Tata E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Tata E would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ascari KZ1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ascari KZ1 (500 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 352 more horse power than 2002 Tata E. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ascari KZ1 should accelerate faster than 2002 Tata E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Tata E weights approximately 20 kg more than 2009 Ascari KZ1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ascari KZ1 (550 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Tata E. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Ascari KZ1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Tata E.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Tata E | 2009 Ascari KZ1 | |
Make | Tata | Ascari |
Model | E | KZ1 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 4941 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 500 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 550 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1138 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2636 mm |