2002 Toyota Caldina vs. 2010 Jaguar XF

To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota Caldina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota Caldina would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 142 more horse power than 2002 Toyota Caldina. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota Caldina.

Because 2010 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Caldina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 430 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota Caldina. (170 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota Caldina.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Toyota Caldina 2010 Jaguar XF
Make Toyota Jaguar
Model Caldina XF
Year Released 2002 2010
Body Type Station Wagon Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1786 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 129 HP 271 HP
Torque 170 Nm 600 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4520 mm 4961 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1877 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1461 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2908 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 70 L