2002 Toyota Celica vs. 1989 Citroen XM
To start off, 2002 Toyota Celica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,088 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Celica (129 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (108 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 197 kg more than 2002 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (235 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota Celica. (170 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota Celica. 1989 Citroen XM has automatic transmission and 2002 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 2002 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Citroen XM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Toyota Celica | 1989 Citroen XM | |
Make | Toyota | Citroen |
Model | Celica | XM |
Year Released | 2002 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1832 cc | 2088 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 85.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 21.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1337 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.4 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |