2002 Toyota ES 3 vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Toyota ES 3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Toyota ES 3 | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Toyota | Volkswagen |
| Model | ES 3 | Polo |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1364 cc | 1043 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2340 mm |
