2002 Toyota ES 3 vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota ES 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota ES 3 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 1970 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota ES 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Toyota ES 3 | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
| Make | Toyota | Cadillac |
| Model | ES 3 | ESCALADE |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1364 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 327 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 2670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5144 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2007 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1928 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2947 mm |
