2002 Toyota F-1 vs. 1975 Volvo 264
To start off, 2002 Toyota F-1 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 264. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 264 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2002 Toyota F-1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota F-1 (183 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 264. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota F-1 should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 264. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota F-1 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1975 Volvo 264. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota F-1 (430 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 264. (203 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota F-1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 264.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Toyota F-1 | 1975 Volvo 264 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | F-1 | 264 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 430 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1450 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |
