2002 Toyota F-1 vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2002 Toyota F-1 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2002 Toyota F-1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota F-1 (183 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota F-1 should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota F-1 (430 Nm) has 336 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota F-1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 66. 1976 Volvo 66 has automatic transmission and 2002 Toyota F-1 has manual transmission. 2002 Toyota F-1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Volvo 66 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Toyota F-1 | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | F-1 | 66 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 430 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
