2002 Toyota F-1 vs. 2006 Volvo S40
To start off, 2006 Volvo S40 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota F-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota F-1 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2002 Toyota F-1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota F-1 (183 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2006 Volvo S40. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota F-1 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo S40.
Because 2002 Toyota F-1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Toyota F-1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota F-1 (430 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volvo S40. (165 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota F-1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Toyota F-1 | 2006 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | F-1 | S40 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 430 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |
