2002 Toyota F-1 vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota F-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota F-1 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (321 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2002 Toyota F-1. (183 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota F-1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 308 kg more than 2002 Toyota F-1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Toyota F-1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC60 (480 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota F-1. (430 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota F-1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Toyota F-1 | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | F-1 | XC60 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 321 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 430 Nm | 480 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1918 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2774 mm |
