2002 Toyota FCHV 5 vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 2,981 cc, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S60 (246 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 weights approximately 225 kg more than 2000 Volvo S60.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 (353 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volvo S60. (330 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volvo S60.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | FCHV 5 | S60 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2981 cc | 2319 cc |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 246 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 245 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1701 kg | 1476 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2720 mm | 4580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |
