2002 Toyota FCHV 5 vs. 2001 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Smart ForFour. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Smart ForFour would be higher. At 2,981 cc, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2001 Smart ForFour. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 should accelerate faster than 2001 Smart ForFour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 weights approximately 736 kg more than 2001 Smart ForFour. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 (353 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Smart ForFour. (100 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 | 2001 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Toyota | Smart |
| Model | FCHV 5 | ForFour |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2981 cc | 1124 cc |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1701 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2720 mm | 3760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2510 mm |
