2002 Toyota FCHV 5 vs. 2009 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 would be higher. At 2,981 cc, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Eos (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 weights approximately 477 kg more than 2009 Volkswagen Eos.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 (353 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volkswagen Eos. (281 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volkswagen Eos.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 | 2009 Volkswagen Eos | |
| Make | Toyota | Volkswagen |
| Model | FCHV 5 | Eos |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2981 cc | 1982 cc |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1701 kg | 1224 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2720 mm | 4410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |
