2002 Toyota Highlander vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2002 Toyota Highlander is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Highlander (149 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (95 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 2002 Toyota Highlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Volvo 140. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Highlander (221 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (147 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Toyota Highlander | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Highlander | 140 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 95 HP |
Torque | 221 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.5 mm | 84.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2620 mm |